How does rising atmospheric CO2 affect marine organisms?

Learn how plants respond to higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations

Click to locate material archived on our website by topic


Salinity (Effects on Plants) -- Summary
In agricultural enterprises the buildup of soil salinity from repeated irrigations can sometimes reduce crop yields. Similarly, in unmanaged ecosystems where exposure to brackish or salty water is commonplace, saline soils can induce growth stresses in plants that are not naturally adapted to coping with this problem. Consequently, it is important to understand how rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations may interact with soil salinity to affect plant growth; and in the paragraphs that follow, we summarize the results of a number of experiments that were designed to obtain knowledge pertinent to this endeavor.

We begin with the paper of Ball et al. (1997), who grew two Australian mangrove species -- Rhizophora stylosa and Rhizophora apiculata, the former of which has a slower relative growth rate than R. apiculata but also a greater salt tolerance -- for 14 weeks in glasshouses with different combinations of atmospheric CO2 ( 340 and 700 ppm), relative humidity (43 and 86%), and salinity (25 and 75% of seawater) with the purpose of determining the effects of these variables on their development and growth; and averaged across the entire experiment, the elevated CO2 treatment significantly increased the rates of net photosynthesis in both species, but only when they were grown at the lower salinity level.

Working with an agricultural crop, Mavrogianopoulos et al. (1999) grew parnon melons (Cucumis melo) in greenhouses subjected to atmospheric CO2 concentrations of 400, 800, and 1200 ppm for the first five hours of each day, irrigating them with nutrient solutions containing 0, 25, and 50 mM NaCl to determine the interactive effects of elevated CO2 and salinity on plant growth and yield. This work revealed that exposure to CO2 concentrations of 800 and 1200 ppm increased net photosynthetic rates by averages of 75 and 120%, respectively -- regardless of salinity -- relative to rates measured at 400 ppm CO2. In addition, the CO2 enrichment partially reversed the negative effects of salinity on shoot growth, leaf growth, and leaf chlorophyll content; and although melon yields were significantly increased with atmospheric CO2 enrichment at all salinity levels, the greatest CO2-induced enhancement was observed at the lowest salinity level.

Also working in the agricultural sector, Maggio et al. (2002) grew tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants in controlled-environment chambers maintained at atmospheric CO2 concentrations of either 400 or 900 ppm in combination with varying degrees of soil salinity for a period of one month, finding that plants grown in the elevated CO2 treatment tolerated an average root-zone salinity threshold value that was about 60% greater than that exhibited by plants grown in the low CO2 treatment, while the water-use of the CO2-enriched plants was about half that of the low-CO2 plants. In addition, the amount of chloride in the leaves of the CO2-enriched plants was significantly lower than that in the leaves of the low-CO2 plants.

Very similar findings were reported in a review paper produced during the same time period by Poorter and Perez-Soba (2001), who found there were few changes in the effects of elevated CO2 on the growth responses of most plants over a wide range of soil salinities, in harmony with the still earlier findings of Idso and Idso (1994) in their review of the literature. Hence, there is abundant evidence that suggests plants should respond positively to future increases in the air's CO2 content, even in situations where mild to moderate stresses may be present due to high soil salinity levels. Nevertheless, new research on the topic continues to be conducted, as scientists strive to "dig deeper" and learn ever more about what we can expect in this regard as the air's CO2 content continues its upward trend.

Syvertsen and Levy (2005), for example, reviewed what is known about salinity stress in citrus trees and how it may be modified by atmospheric CO2 enrichment, beginning by noting that rapidly growing plants almost always use more water than slower growing plants, and that, "in citrus, many vigorous rootstocks that produce fast-growing trees also tend to have poor salt tolerance (Castle et al., 1993)," possibly because they accumulate more salt in their tissues because of their greater uptake of water. When growing plants in CO2-enriched air, however, plant stomatal conductance and water use are often decreased at the same time that net photosynthesis and growth are increased, so that, in the words of the two scientists, "elevated CO2 almost always leads to higher water use efficiency as it disconnects rapid tree growth from high water use." Consequently, as they explain, "if salt uptake is coupled with water uptake, then leaves grown at elevated CO2 should have lower salt concentrations than leaves grown at ambient CO2 (Ball and Munns, 1992)." So, do things really work that way?

"As expected," Syvertsen and Levy continue, "all citrus rootstock species studied increased growth and water use efficiency in response to elevated CO2 that was twice ambient," and they say that generally, but not always, "the salinity-induced accumulation of sodium (Na+) in leaves was less when seedlings were grown at elevated CO2 than at ambient CO2." One specific exception -- where Na+ accumulation was not affected by elevated CO2 -- was Rangpur lime (Citrus reticulata); but they report that this citrus variety is already relatively salt-tolerant, and that another variety of the same species (Cleopatra mandarin) had lower leaf chloride concentrations in CO2-enriched air than in ambient air.

Contemporaneously, Rasse et al. (2005) reported on the long-term effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the net CO2 exchange, shoot density and shoot biomass of the wetland sedge, Scirpus olneyi, as well as how those effects were influenced by salinity (which is one of the main environmental stressors of the wetlands), in one of the longest (17 years) in situ atmospheric CO2 enrichment experiments ever conducted -- in this particular case, in a natural wetland located at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center on the Chesapeake Bay (USA). In every year of that period, the net CO2 exchange rate and shoot biomass and density of the plants growing in the CO2-enriched (ambient +340 ppm) air were all greater than they were among the plants growing in ambient air. In the case of the net CO2 exchange rate, for example, the extra CO2 boosted it by 80% in the first year of the study, but the enhancement declined to about 35% by the end of the third year and remained relatively constant at that value over the following 15 years. Shoot biomass and density also increased, but whereas the CO2-induced stimulation of the net CO2 exchange rate remained essentially constant over the past 15 years, the CO2-induced stimulations of shoot biomass and density increased over time. After 5 years of a nearly constant stimulation of 16%, for example, shoot density increased in near linear fashion to a value 128% above the ambient-air value at the end of year 17. The response of shoot biomass to CO2 enrichment was also nearly linear, reaching a value approximately 70% above ambient at year 17. What is more, the trends in shoot density and biomass do not appear to be leveling off, leading one to wonder just how high the CO2-induced stimulations will ultimately rise.

Net CO2 exchange, shoot density and shoot biomass were also closely correlated with salinity, such that the higher the salinity, the more detrimental were its effects on these variables. But even at the highest levels of salinity reported, atmospheric CO2 enrichment was able to produce a positive, albeit reduced, stimulatory effect on net CO2 exchange. For shoot biomass and density, the responses were better still. Not only did atmospheric CO2 enrichment essentially eradicate the detrimental effects of salinity, there was, in the words of Rasse et al., "evidence suggesting that salinity stress increased the stimulation of shoot density by elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration."

Several important things were demonstrated by this experiment. First, as the researchers state, their results "leave no doubt as to the sustained response of the salt march sedge to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration." Second, given the fact that the initial responses of the three growth variables declined or remained low during the first few years of the study, but leveled out or increased thereafter, it is clear that much more long-term research needs to be carried out if we are to ascertain the full and correct impacts of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plants. In the case of the wetland sedge of this study, for example, it took about ten growing seasons before an increasing trend in the shoot density could clearly be recognized. Last of all, there is what the researchers call their "most important finding," i.e., the fact that "a species response to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration can continually increase when [it] is under stress and declining in its natural environment."

One year later, Garcia-Sanchez and Syvertsen (2006) grew well watered and fertilized three-month-old rootstock seedlings of Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) and Carrizo citrange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb. x Poncirus trifoliata L.), with or without salt stress (an additional 50 mM NaCl), for eight additional weeks, one plant each in 1.5-liter containers located in controlled-environment greenhouses maintained at either 360 or 700 ppm CO2, during which time, and at the end of the experiment, they measured a number of plant properties and physiological processes that allowed them to test the hypothesis that "salinity tolerance of citrus rootstock seedlings would be increased when grown in elevated CO2."

At the end of their experiment, the two researchers found that "elevated CO2 increased plant growth, shoot/root ratio, leaf dry weight per area, net assimilation of CO2, chlorophyll, and water-use efficiency." The increase in the last of these parameters was caused by a decrease in transpiration and an increase in plant biomass, the latter of which plant properties received a 27% CO2-induced boost in the salt-stress treatment and a 40% boost in the non-salt-stress treatment for Cleopatra mandarin, while it was enhanced by 49% in the salt-stress treatment and by 43% in the non-salt-stress treatment for Carrizo citrange. In addition, they report that "elevated CO2 increased salinity tolerance in the relatively salt-sensitive Carrizo more than in the salt-tolerant Cleopatra."

Focusing once again on tomato plants, Takagi et al. (2008) grew well watered and fertilized Solanum lycopersicum (formerly Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings for two weeks at two different levels of irrigation-water salinity (0 or 100 mM NaCl) in 3-L pots inside the greenhouse of Hiroshima University (Japan), at atmospheric CO2 concentrations of either 370 or 1000 ppm, while measuring various plant properties and physiological responses. In doing so, they found that the "salt-stress treatment severely decreased whole-plant biomass," as well as "leaf photosynthesis and transport of carbon assimilates," but that "the impact of stress on these activities was alleviated under elevated CO2 concentration." This alleviation, as they describe it, "was promoted when sink activity relative to source activity was higher," which they say was "probably owing to improvement of oxidative stress," due "at least partially to the higher constitutive antioxidant enzymes' activities," as well as improved water status "through stomatal closure at high CO2 concentration." Hence, they concluded that their study "corroborates earlier reports that the interaction between salinity stress and CO2 concentration results in the alleviative effect of elevated CO2 on the negative effects of salinity on plant growth."

Shifting gears slightly, Geissler et al. (2009a) write that "desertification is often accompanied by soil salinization ... leading to growth conditions inacceptable for most conventional crops." However, they note that what they call "a promising solution" to the problem is "the desalinization and reclamation of degraded land by making sustainable use of naturally salt-tolerant halophytes under seawater irrigation (including drainage mechanisms which avoid salt accumulation in the soil)."

In a study germane to this function, the three researchers grew well-fertilized two-month-old Aster tripolium plants in a hydroponic system maintained at seawater salinity (sws) levels of 0, 50 and 100% within open-top chambers that were maintained at atmospheric CO2 concentrations of either 380 ppm (ambient) or 520 ppm (elevated), during which time they measured several plant properties and processes. This work revealed that growing the plants with water of 100% sws (as opposed to 0% sws) resulted in "a significant decrease in photosynthesis and water use efficiency and to an increase in oxidative stress." But when the air's CO2 concentration was raised by 37% (from 380 to 520 ppm), there was a subsequent increase of 84% in photosynthesis and 60% in water use efficiency. In addition, they determined that "the improved water and energy supply was used to increase the investment in mechanisms reducing water loss and oxidative stress." Hence, they concluded that because "elevated CO2 concentration enhances the energy and water supply of Aster tripolium, ameliorates oxidative stress, and thus enhances the survival of this plant in saline habitats," it "can help in desalinizing and reclaiming degraded land and sequestering CO2, thus counteracting the greenhouse effect."

In a second paper that focused on a different aspect of the same experiment, Geissler et al. (2009b) write that halophytes are "naturally salt tolerant plants which are able to complete their life cycle on a substrate rich in NaCl," and that cash-crop halophytes "can be used for various economical and ecological purposes, e.g. for food, fodder, for obtaining timber, fibers, reeds or chemicals, as ornamental plants, for coastal protection, land reclamation or greenification of deserts," noting that Aster tripolium, in particular, "can be used for food (the leaves have a high nutritional value and can be eaten as salad or vegetable), for fodder and as an ornamental plant."

In this paper, the three scientists report that the 40% increase in the air's CO2 content increased the light-saturated rate of net photosynthesis by 56%, 82% and 71%, respectively, in the plants irrigated with water of 0, 50 and 100% sws, while it increased their water use efficiencies by 14, 26 and 61% at the same respective sws percentages. Other positive impacts of the CO2-enriched air were "an enhanced synthesis of proline, carbohydrates and proteins," and they say that "these mechanisms led to a higher survival rate under saline conditions, i.e. to an improved salt tolerance." Hence, they concluded that "A. tripolium is a promising cash crop halophyte which will probably benefit from rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations in the future," and that "its sustainable use can help feeding the growing world population."

Working with a more common crop, Perez-Lopez et al. (2009a) grew two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Alpha and Iranis, within controlled-environment growth chambers at either ambient (350 ppm) or elevated (700 ppm) atmospheric CO2 concentrations in a 3:1 perlite:vermiculite mixture that was watered with Hoagland's solution every two days (until the first leaf was completely expanded at 14 days), after which a salinity treatment was administered by adding 0, 80, 160 or 240 mM NaCl to the Hoagland's solution every two days for 14 more days. Then, after a total of 28 days, the primary leaf of each barley plant was harvested and assessed for a number of biochemical properties.

In following these procedures, the seven scientists found that in the various ambient-air salinity treatments, the deleterious effects of reactive oxygen species on barley leaves were made apparent through ion leakage and increases in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), which rose ever higher as salt concentrations rose ever higher. "On the other hand," as they continue, "when [the] salinity treatment was imposed under elevated CO2 conditions, lower solute leakage and TBARS levels were observed, suggesting that the oxidative stress caused by salinity was lower." Hence, they concluded that "elevated CO2 protects barley cultivars from oxidative stress," noting that "the relief of oxidative stress damage observed in our barley leaves grown under a CO2 enriched atmosphere has also been observed in alfalfa (Sgherri et al., 1998), pine (Vu et al., 1999) and oak (Schwanz and Polle, 2001)."

Working with the same plants in the same experiment, but focusing on different phenomena, Perez-Lopez et al. (2009b) measured relative water content, water potential and its components, transpiration rate, hydraulic conductance, and water use efficiency, computed as plant dry weight produced per unit of water transpired. And as a result, it was determined, in their words, that "elevated CO2 improves barley water relations under saline conditions because elevated CO2 permits a greater osmotic adjustment, most likely due to a greater carbon supply from increased photosynthesis, and a lower passive dehydration due to reductions in stomatal conductance and hydraulic conductance." More specifically, they state that by the end of their study, the water use efficiency of salt-stressed plants grown in the elevated CO2 treatment was 61% greater in Alpha and 43% greater in Iranis compared to the water use efficiency of plants grown in the ambient CO2 treatment. Thus, the five researchers concluded that "elevated CO2 will mitigate the negative impact of salinity on barley growth and will enable plants to remain turgid and functional for a longer period and for a higher salt concentration," noting that "these facts open the possibility of a future successful development of this species in saline areas in which nowadays growth is not possible." And this finding has enormous implications, in light of the fact that Frommer et al. (1999) have estimated that approximately one-third of the world's irrigated land is currently unsuitable for crop production because of its high salinity.

Last of all, in yet a third paper devoted to still other characteristics of barley plants grown in the same experiment, Perez-Lopez et al. (2010) report the results of their measurements of midday leaf water potential, osmotic potential, osmotic potential at full turgor, dehydration and osmotic adjustment, and their subsequent harvesting of the primary leaf of each plant and their assessments of its concentrations of various minerals and organic compounds. This work revealed, as they describe it, that "elevated CO2 permitted plant metabolism to be maintained at a better status under salt stress than did ambient CO2," and that "growth was reduced more at ambient than at elevated CO2." They also found that "elevated CO2 widens the range of salt concentrations at which osmotic adjustment continues to be efficient by providing a greater supply of carbon and Adenosine-5'-triphosphate," which is a multifunctional nucleotide that transports chemical energy within cells for metabolism and is, in their words, "needed to perform the energetically expensive salt tolerance mechanisms." Thus, they concluded -- much as they had in their earlier papers -- that "under future environmental conditions, barley species will be able to succeed in salinized areas in which growth is not currently possible."

This is basically the same story that is told by the several other papers that are reviewed in this Summary; and, therefore, it's safe to say that most plants should continue to respond positively to continued increases in the air's CO2 content, even in situations where significant stresses may be present due to high soil salinity levels.

References
Ball, M.C., Cochrane, M.J. and Rawson, H.M. 1997. Growth and water use of the mangroves Rhizophora apiculata and R. stylosa in response to salinity and humidity under ambient and elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 20: 1158-1166.

Ball, M.C. and Munns, R. 1992. Plant responses to salinity under elevated atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Australian Journal of Botany 40: 515-525.

Castle, W.S., Tucker, D.P.H., Krezdorn, A.H. and Youtsey, C.O. 1993. Rootstocks for Florida Citrus: Rootstock Selection, the First Step to Success. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Frommer, W.B., Ludewig, U. and Rentsch, D. 1999. Taking transgenic plants with a pinch of salt. Science 285: 1222-1223.

Garcia-Sanchez, F. and Syvertsen, J.P. 2006. Salinity tolerance of Cleopatra mandarin and Carrizo citrange citrus rootstock seedlings is affected by CO2 enrichment during growth. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 131: 24-31.

Geissler, N., Hussin, S. and Koyro, H.-W. 2009a. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration ameliorates effects of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis and leaf structure of Aster tripolium L. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 137-151.

Geissler, N., Hussin, S. and Koyro, H.-W. 2009b. Interactive effects of NaCl salinity and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on growth, photosynthesis, water relations and chemical composition of the potential cash crop halophyte Aster tripolium L. Environmental and Experimental Botany 65: 220-231.

Idso, K.E. and Idso, S.B. 1994. Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment in the face of environmental constraints: A review of the past 10 years' research. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 69: 153-203.

Maggio, A., Dalton, F.N. and Piccinni, G. 2002. The effects of elevated carbon dioxide on static and dynamic indices for tomato salt tolerance. European Journal of Agronomy 16: 197-206.

Mavrogianopoulos, G.N., Spanakis, J. and Tsikalas, P. 1999. Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment and salinity on photosynthesis and yield in melon. Scientia Horticulturae 79: 51-63.

Perez-Lopez, U., Robredo, A., Lacuesta, M., Mena-Petite, A. and Munoz-Rueda, A. 2009b. The impact of salt stress on the water status of barley plants is partially mitigated by elevated CO2. Environmental and Experimental Botany 66: 463-470.

Perez-Lopez, U., Robredo, A., Lacuesta, M., Munoz-Rueda, A. and Mena-Petite, A. 2010. Atmospheric CO2 concentration influences the contributions of osmolyte accumulation and cell wall elasticity to salt tolerance in barley cultivars. Journal of Plant Physiology 167: 15-22.

Perez-Lopez, U., Robredo, A., Lacuestra, M., Sgherri, C., Munoz-Rueda, A., Navari-Izzo, F. and Mena-Petite, A. 2009a. The oxidative stress caused by salinity in two barley cultivars is mitigated by elevated CO2. Physiologia Plantarum 135: 29-42.

Poorter, H. and Perez-Soba, M. 2001. The growth response of plants to elevated CO2 under non-optimal environmental conditions. Oecologia 129: 1-20.

Rasse, D.P., Peresta, G. and Drake, B.G. 2005. Seventeen years of elevated CO2 exposure in a Chesapeake Bay Wetland: sustained but contrasting responses of plant growth and CO2 uptake. Global Change Biology 11: 369-377.

Schwanz, P. and Polle, A. 2001. Differential stress responses of antioxidative systems to drought in pendunculate oak (Quercus robur) and maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) grown under high CO2 concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 133-143.

Sgherri, C., Quartacci, M., Menconi, M., Raschi, A. and Navari-Izzo, F. 1998. Interactions between drought and elevated CO2 on alfalfa plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 152: 118-124.

Syvertsen, J. and Levy, Y. 2005. Salinity interactions with other abiotic and biotic stresses in citrus. HortTechnology 15: 100-103.

Takagi, M., El-Shemy, H.A., Sasaki, S., Toyama, S., Kanai, S., Saneoka, H. and Fujita, K. 2008. Elevated CO2 concentration alleviates salinity stress in tomato plant. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil and Plant Science: 10.1080/09064710801932425.

Vu, J.C., Gesch, R., Allen, L.H., Boote, K. and Bowes, G. 1999. CO2 enrichment delays a rapid, drought induced decrease in Rubisco small subunit transcript abundance. Journal of Plant Physiology 155: 139-142.

Last updated 2 June 2010