Learn how plants respond to higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations

How does rising atmospheric CO2 affect marine organisms?

Click to locate material archived on our website by topic


Coral Reefs Responding to Temperature Stress via Thermal Adaptation -- Summary
As living entities, corals are not only acted upon by the various elements of their environment, they also react or respond to them. And when changes in environmental factors pose a challenge to their continued existence, they sometimes take major defensive or adaptive actions to insure their survival. A simple but pertinent example of one form of this phenomenon is thermal adaptation, which feature has been observed by several researchers to operate in corals in response to the stress of high temperature. This summary presents a review of such scientists' work, demonstrating that predictions of vast coral demise due to global warming are unlikely to occur.

Fang et al. (1997) experimented with samples of Acropora grandis taken from the hot water outlet of a nuclear power plant near Nanwan Bay, Taiwan. In 1988, the year the power plant began full operation, the coral samples were completely bleached within two days of exposure to a temperature of 33°C. Two years later, however, "samples taken from the same area did not even start bleaching until six days after exposure to 33°C temperatures," thus illustrating their ability to thermally adapt.

Middlebrook et al. (2008) reported similar findings. They collected multiple upward-growing branch tips of the reef-building coral Acropora aspera from three large colonies at the southern end of Australia's Great Barrier Reef and placed them on racks immersed in running seawater within four 750-liter tanks maintained at the mean local ambient temperature (27°C) and exposed to natural reef-flat summer daily light levels. Then, two weeks before a simulated bleaching event-where water temperature was raised to a value of 34°C for six days-they boosted the water temperature in one of the tanks to 31°C for 48 hours, and in another tank they boosted it to 31°C for 48 hours one week before the simulated bleaching event. In the third tank they had no pre-heating treatment, and in the fourth tank they used no pre-heating nor any simulated bleaching event. And at different points throughout the study, they measured photosystem II efficiency, xanthophyll and chlorophyll a concentrations, and Symbiodinium densities.

Results indicated the symbionts of the corals exposed to the 48-hour pre-bleaching thermal stress "were found to have more effective photoprotective mechanisms," including "changes in non-photochemical quenching and xanthophyll cycling." They further determined "these differences in photoprotection were correlated with decreased loss of symbionts, with those corals that were not pre-stressed performing significantly worse, losing over 40% of their symbionts and having a greater reduction in photosynthetic efficiency," whereas "pre-stressed coral symbiont densities were unchanged at the end of the bleaching." In light of these findings, Middlebrook et al. say their study "conclusively demonstrates that thermal stress events two weeks and one week prior to a bleaching event provide significantly increased thermal tolerance to the coral holobiont, suggesting that short time-scale thermal adaptation can have profound effects on coral bleaching."

In another laboratory-based study, Bellantuono et al. (2012) "tested the response of Acropora millepora to thermal preconditioning by exposing coral nubbins to 28°C (3°C below bleaching threshold) for 10 days, prior to challenging them with water temperatures of 31°C for 8 days," while "in another treatment (non-preconditioned), corals were exposed to 31°C without prior exposure to the 28°C treatment." They conducted all of these procedures in a set of "transparent tanks plumbed into flowing sea water, with four replicate tanks for each treatment."

The three researchers discovered short-term preconditioning to higher-than-ambient temperatures (but still 3°C below the experimentally determined bleaching threshold) for ten days provided thermal tolerance for the scleractinian coral and its symbionts. And based on various genotypic analyses they conducted, they determined "the acclimatization of this coral species to thermal stress does not come down to simple changes in Symbiodinium symbiont shuffling and/or the bacterial communities that associate with reef-building corals bacterial shuffling." These findings, Bellantuono et al. write, suggest "the physiological plasticity of the host and/or symbiotic components appears to play an important role in responding to ocean warming." They then describe some real-world examples of this phenomenon possibly playing a crucial role in preserving corals exposed to extreme warm temperatures in the past (Fang et al., 1997; Middlebrook et al., 2008; Maynard et al., 2008b).

South of Malta in the Mediterranean Sea, Naumann et al. (2013) collected live specimens of two scleractinian cold-water coral (CWCs) species, Dendrophyllia cornigera and D. dianthus. They transferred the specimens into two identically equipped and darkened 100-L flow-through aquaria through which Mediterranean subsurface seawater was continuously pumped from a 50-meter depth and supplied to the tanks at a rate of about one liter per minute. They maintained this water at a temperature of 12.5 ± 0.1°C for approximately 30 months before initiating the primary phase of their experiment, which was to increase the temperature of one of the aquariums by 0.5°C per day up to 17.5 ± 0.1°C, thereafter maintaining it for a further 87 days, while conducting "daily visual assessments of coral health (i.e. tentacle protrusion, suspension feeding and mortality/survival) and monthly growth measurements by the buoyant weight technique (Davies, 1989)," ultimately translating the latter into coral dry weight data.

The three researchers write, "over the entire experimental period, both CWC species showed neither differences in tentacle protrusion and suspension feeding nor mortality at ambient (12.5°C) or elevated (17.5°C) seawater temperatures." They also state, "D. cornigera specimens developed a non-quantified number of new polyps at both temperatures suggesting efficient thermal acclimatization." In addition, they report "D. dianthus exhibited growth rates for ambient and elevated temperatures of 0.23 ± 0.08% per day and 0.19 ± 0.06% per day, whereas D. cornigera grew at 0.05 ± 0.01% per day under ambient and 0.14% ± 0.07% per day under elevated temperature conditions." Their findings "suggest that D. dianthus and D. cornigera may be capable of surviving in warmer environments than previously reported, and thus challenge temperature as the paramount limiting environmental factor for the occurrence of some CWC species."

Outside the laboratory and in the real world of nature, multiple researchers have confirmed the phenomenon of thermal adaptation in corals in response to temperature-related stresses.

Brown et al. (2002) conducted a 17-year study of coral reef flats at Ko Phuket, Thailand, assessing coral reef changes in response to elevated sea temperatures in 1991, 1995, 1997, and 1998. Although the authors state many corals bleached "during elevated sea temperatures in May 1991 and 1995," they report "no bleaching was recorded in 1997." In addition, they write, "in May 1998 very limited bleaching occurred although sea temperatures were higher than previous events in 1991 and 1995 (Dunne and Brown, 2001)." When bleaching did take place, they note, "it led only to partial mortality in coral colonies, with most corals recovering their color within 3-5 months of initial paling."

Riegl (2003) reviewed what was known at the time about the responses of coral reefs to high-temperature-induced bleaching, focusing primarily on the Arabian Gulf, which they note "has recently experienced high-frequency recurrences of temperature-related bleaching (1996, 1998, 2002)." Riegl reports in each of the three high-temperature years, sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies of 2 to 2.5°C above average in situ measured summer maximum SSTs persisted from April to September, and local maxima of in situ measured SSTs were 35.5°C in 1996 and 37°C in 2002. In response to these high-temperature events, Acropora, which during the 1996 and 1998 events always bleached first and suffered heaviest mortality, bleached less than all other corals in 2002 at Sir Abu Nuair (an offshore island of the United Arab Emirates) and actually recovered along the coast of Dubai between Jebel Ali and Ras Hasyan. Thus Riegl states, "the unexpected resistance of Sir Abu Nuair Acropora to bleaching in 2002 might indicate support for the hypothesis of Baker (2001) and Baker et al. (2002) that the symbiont communities on recovering reefs of the future might indeed be more resistant to subsequent bleaching," and "the Arabian Gulf perhaps provides us with some aspects which might be described as a 'glimpse into the future,' with ... hopes for at least some level of coral/zooxanthellae adaptation."

Jimenez and Cortes (2003a) documented coral cover variability in the Pacific between 1992 and 2001, when the El Niņo warming events of 1991-1992 (weak) and 1997-1998 ("the strongest in recorded history") affected coral communities along the Costa Rican central Pacific coast, after which they reported their observations, as well as those of other scientists pertaining to these and earlier warming events caused by the El Niņos of 1982-1983 (very strong) and 1986-1987 (moderate). The authors report there was a "paucity of bleaching and mortality in the study area in 1987 despite sea temperature anomalies similar to or higher than in other years in which bleaching and mortality occurred," and this situation "may have been the result of the higher cloud cover and runoff which, in combination, decreased solar radiation stress." Likewise, they suggest "similar atmospheric conditions during 1998 may explain the considerably small number of corals that bleached that year in the upwelling area of [Costa Rica's] Golfo de Papagayo," where they report "few corals bleached, even though sea temperature anomalies were higher than in autumn 1997."

As to the 1997-1998 El Niņo, considered to be "the strongest event on record (McPhaden, 1999; Enfield, 2001)," the authors report "mortality of entire colonies associated with this event was remarkably low in Costa Rica, less than 6% (Jimenez et al., 2001)," and "only one coral species, Psammocora stellata, disappeared at one locality (Cambutal) after the 1997-1998 warming event." In addition, this disappearance "did not have an effect on the percent of total cover, which was not significantly dissimilar to previous years." They further report "this species was not affected in Mexico by the 1997-1998 warming episode (Carriquiry et al., 2001)."

As for other potential explanations for these observations, Jimenez and Cortes note conspecific corals "have shown differences in susceptibility to bleach, mortality rates and recovery capabilities (Brown, 1997; Hoegh-Guldberg, 1999; Marshall and Baird, 2000; Fitt et al., 2001; Glynn et al., 2001)," which may "reflect corals' adaptation to local conditions, different warming intensities at each locality, thermal acclimation, and presence of several clades of symbionts." In fact, they state moderate warming events "may positively affect coral reef communities," noting "increases in growth rates, reproductive activity and recruitment pulses have been observed after some El Niņo episodes (Glynn et al., 1991, 1994; Feingold, 1995; Guzman and Cortes, 2001; Vargas-Angel et al., 2001; Jimenez and Cortes, 2003b)."

Guzman and Cortes (2007) note coral reefs of the eastern Pacific Ocean "suffered unprecedented mass mortality at a regional scale as a consequence of the anomalous sea warming during the 1982-1983 El Niņo." At Cocos Island (5°32'N, 87°04'W), in particular, where they conducted a survey of three representative reefs in 1987, they found remaining live coral cover was only 3 percent of what it had been before the great El Niņo four years earlier (Guzman and Cortes, 1992). Based on this finding and the similar observations of other scientists at other reefs, they predicted "the recovery of the reefs' framework would take centuries, and recovery of live coral cover, decades." In 2002, therefore, nearly 20 years after the disastrous coral-killing warming, they returned to see how correct they were after their initial assessment of the El Niņo damage, quantifying "the live coral cover and species composition of five reefs, including the three previously assessed in 1987."

Regarding thermal tolerance, the most interesting aspect of their study was the occurrence of a second major El Niņo between the two assessment periods. In fact, Guzman and Cortes state "the 1997-1998 warming event around Cocos Island was more intense than all previous El Niņo events," noting temperature anomalies "above 2°C lasted 4 months in 1997-1998 compared to 1 month in 1982-83." Nevertheless, they report, "the coral communities suffered a lower and more selective mortality in 1997-1998, as was also observed in other areas of the eastern Pacific (Glynn et al., 2001; Cortes and Jimenez, 2003; Zapata and Vargas-Angel, 2003)," which indicates some type of thermal adaptation occurred after the 1982-83 El Niņo.

In an article published in the scientific journal Coral Reefs, Maynard et al. (2008a) question the wisdom of "popularizing predictions based on essentially untested assumptions," among which they list the IPCC-held claims, "all corals live close to their thermal limits" and "corals cannot adapt/acclimatize to rapid rates of change."

In discussing the first of these "untested assumptions," the three Australian researchers say "predictions that reefs will disappear as a result of global warming are based, at least in part, on the assumption corals are living close to their maximum thermal limits." However, they note, "the severity of bleaching responses varies dramatically within and among taxa," citing McClanahan et al. (2009), and "such variable bleaching susceptibility implies that there is a considerable variation in the extent to which coral species are adapted to local environmental conditions."

The three scientists further report little is known about the sensitivity of coral population response to climate-induced changes in vital rates; but they state a large body of evidence "supports temperature tolerance varying among species, populations, communities, and reef regions (Marshall and Baird, 2000; Coles and Brown, 2003)." Hence, they conclude, "even in the absence of an adaptive response, a change in the relative abundance of species is a far more likely outcome of climate change than the disappearance of reef corals," citing Loya et al. (2001), McClanahan (2002), and Hughes et al. (2003).

The three researchers, moreover, clearly accept there is "an adaptive response," in contradiction of the second untested assumption Maynard et al. (2008a) discuss, stating "a number of studies suggest that bleaching mortality rates have declined and thermal tolerance has increased in some regions." They report, for example, "mortality rates in the Eastern Pacific were significantly lower in 1998 when compared with 1982 and 1983 (Glynn et al., 2001)," and "Maynard et al. (2008b) found thermal tolerance of three common coral genera on the Great Barrier Reef to be greater in 2002 than that expected from the relationship between temperature stress and bleaching severity observed in 1998."

As to how this adaptation is accomplished, the Australian scientists say there is "circumstantial evidence for ongoing evolution of temperature tolerance between both species and reefs," citing Coles and Brown (2003). In addition, they suggest "symbiont shuffling from less to more stress-resistant clades is another mechanism by which corals may increase the thermal tolerance of the holobiont." And they declare "there is growing evidence that such shuffling can increase thermal tolerance, at least in the short term (Berkelmans and van Oppen, 2006)." Thus Maynard et al. (2008a) conclude, "it is premature to suggest that widespread reef collapse is a certain consequence of ongoing bleaching, or that this will inevitably lead to fisheries collapses."

Focusing on coral reefs of the Tiahura outer reef sector at the western end of the north shore of Moorea, French Polynesia, a region which "is largely free of direct anthropogenic disturbances," Adjeroud et al. (2009) describe the results of detailed observations made there periodically since the early 1970s and annually since 1991. This history, they write, "constitutes one of the longest records of coral reef dynamics." Concentrating on the period of detailed annual observations (1991 and onward), the ten researchers documented a significant decline in coral cover followed the two disturbances of 1991 (a major bleaching event and a cyclone), when "coral cover (pooled among genera) declined from 51.0 ± 9.5% in early 1991 to 24.2 ± 14.4% in 1992, and 22.5 ± 9.3% in 1993." This decline, they write, was "among the most rapid of this magnitude recorded following natural disturbances." In contrast, however, they found "the bleaching events of 1994, 2002 and 2003 had no detectable effects on coral cover, even though the thermal anomalies causing these events and their short-term impacts in terms of bleaching prevalence were similar to the 1991 bleaching event."

Adjeroud et al. say their results reveal "corals can recover rapidly following a dramatic decline," and they note similar recoveries of coral cover have been documented at several other locations, citing Connell (1997), Halford et al. (2004), Emslie et al. (2008), and Sheppard et al. (2008). In addition, they state their work "supports the hypothesis that some reefs will undergo gradual changes in structure of their coral communities in response to major stress rather than collapse abruptly," citing Loya et al. (2001), Hughes et al. (2003), and Wakeford et al. (2008).

Maynard et al. (2008b) analyzed the bleaching severity of three genera of corals (Acropora, Pocillopora, and Porites) along five sites in the central section of Australia's Great Barrier Reef in late February and March of 1998 and 2002. Regarding the influence of temperature, the four researchers report "the amount of accumulated thermal stress (as degree heating days) in 2002 was more than double that in 1998 at four of the five sites," and "average surface irradiance during the 2002 thermal anomaly was 15.6-18.9% higher than during the 1998 anomaly." Nevertheless, they found "in 2002, bleaching severity was 30-100% lower than predicted from the relationship between severity and thermal stress in 1998, despite higher solar irradiances during the 2002 thermal event." In addition, "coral genera most susceptible to thermal stress (Pocillopora and Acropora) showed the greatest increase in tolerance."

Maynard et al. state their findings are "consistent with previous studies documenting an increase in thermal tolerance between bleaching events (1982-1983 vs. 1997-1998) in the Galapagos Islands (Podesta and Glynn, 2001), the Gulf of Chiriqi, the Gulf of Panama (Glynn et al., 2001), and on Costa Rican reefs (Jimenez et al., 2001)." They also note "Dunne and Brown (2001) found similar results to [theirs] in the Andaman Sea, in that bleaching severity was far reduced in 1998 compared to 1995 despite sea-temperature and light conditions being more conducive to widespread bleaching in 1998."

The Australian scientists say "the range in bleaching tolerances among corals inhabiting different thermal realms suggests that at least some coral symbioses have the ability to adapt to much higher temperatures than they currently experience in the central Great Barrier Reef," citing Coles and Brown (2003) and Riegl (1999, 2002). In addition, they note, "even within reefs there is a significant variability in bleaching susceptibility for many species (Edmunds, 1994; Marshall and Baird, 2000), suggesting some potential for a shift in thermal tolerance based on selective mortality (Glynn et al., 2001; Jimenez et al., 2001) and local population growth alone." In addition, they say their results suggest "a capacity for acclimatization or adaptation." In conclusion, Maynard et al. (2008b) say "there is emerging evidence of high genetic structure within coral species (Ayre and Hughes, 2004)," suggesting "the capacity for adaptation could be greater than is currently recognized." Indeed, as Skelly et al. (2007) state, "on the basis of the present knowledge of genetic variation in performance traits and species' capacity for evolutionary response, it can be concluded that evolutionary change will often occur concomitantly with changes in climate as well as other environmental changes."

Focusing more on such evolutionary possibilities, Meyer et al. (2009) "performed controlled crosses between three genetically distinct colonies of the branching coral Acropora millepora," and then "compared the families of larvae (which in this species naturally lack symbionts) for several physiological traits." They conducted this work at two different water temperatures-the standard culturing temperature of 28°C and an elevated temperature of 32°C-as well as an even higher temperature of 34°C they maintained for two full days.

Results of the U.S., Canadian, and Australian researchers' analysis confirmed the existence of phenotypic variance for several pertinent thermal and dispersive factors among the families of coral they studied. This finding, they write, "suggests the existence of considerable heritable variation in natural coral populations," and this in turn supports "the possibility of effective adaptive responses to climate change." In addition, they report other analyses of the species they studied have found "high levels of genetic diversity both within and between reefs (Smith-Keune and van Oppen, 2006)," and "studies in other coral species have also uncovered substantial genetic diversity within populations (Ayre and Hughes, 2000; Underwood, 2009; Wang et al., 2009)." Myer et al. thus conclude "additive genetic variance exists within coral populations for several traits that might reasonably be expected to have fitness consequences during global climate change," which "supports the possibility of effective adaptive responses to climate change."

Writing as background for their work, Grimsditch et al. (2010) say "it has been shown that it is possible for colonies to acclimatize to increased temperatures and high irradiance levels so that they are able to resist bleaching events when they occur." They note, in this regard, "threshold temperatures that induce coral bleaching-related mortality vary worldwide-from 27°C in Easter Island (Wellington et al., 2001) to 36°C in the Arabian Gulf (Riegl, 1999)-according to the maximum water temperatures that are normal in the area, implying a capacity of corals and/or zooxanthellae to acclimatize to high temperatures depending on their environment."

In a further exploration of this phenomenon, Grimsditch et al. examined "bleaching responses of corals at four sites (Nyali, Mombasa Marine Park, Kanamai and Vipingo) representing two distinct lagoon habitats on the Kenyan coast (deeper and shallower lagoons)." This was done for the coral community as a whole, and zooxanthellae densities and chlorophyll levels were monitored for three target species (Pocillopora damicornis, Porites lutea, and Porites cylindrica) during a non-bleaching year (2006) and a mild bleaching year (2007). Results indicated "during the 2007 bleaching season, corals in the shallow lagoons of Kanamai and Vipingo were more resistant to bleaching stress than corals in the deeper lagoons of Mombasa Marine Park and Nyali." This result suggests, they write, "corals in the shallower lagoons have acclimatized and/or adapted to the fluctuating environmental conditions they endure on a daily basis and have become more resistant to bleaching stress."

Osborne et al. (2011) note "coral decline is frequently described as ongoing with the integrity and persistence of the reef system threatened by a number of different stressors," citing Bellwood et al. (2004), and "climate change is widely regarded as the single greatest threat to coral reef ecosystems." Therefore, and further noting "the scale and extent of bleaching on the GBR [Great Barrier Reef] since 1998 is unprecedented (Oliver et al., 2009)," and "coral disease is an emerging stressor that was first recorded on the GBR in the early 1990s (Willis et al., 2004; Lough, 2007)," as well as the fact that various harmful environmental disturbances "appear to be increasing in frequency and severity," they decided to quantify the trend in live coral cover of the GBR over the critical temporal interval of 1995-2009, which the IPCC contends was the warmest decade and a half experienced by the planet in the past millennium.

The scientists surveyed coral communities annually between 1995 and 2009 on 47 reefs in six latitudinal sectors across 1300 km of the GBR, surveying between two and five reefs in each sub-region. They did so at three sites on the northeast flank of each reef, with each site consisting of five 50-m transects marked by steel rods at depths between six and nine meters, and "percent cover of live hard coral was estimated from a randomly selected sequence of images taken along the transects using a point-sampling technique in a quincunx pattern (Adbo et al., 2004)."

Results indicated "coral cover increased in six sub-regions and decreased in seven sub-regions," with some of the changes "being very dynamic and others changing little." But with respect to the entire reef system, they report "overall regional coral cover was stable (averaging 29% and ranging from 23% to 33% across years) with no net decline between 1995 and 2009." And to emphasize this fact, they forthrightly state they found "no evidence of consistent, system-wide decline in coral cover since 1995." Thus, in spite of all of the purportedly unprecedented negative influences arrayed against them over the past decade and a half, GBR corals appear to have held their own, adapting to the purported onslaught of stresses and maintaining a stable presence over the totality of their 1300 km linear expanse.

According to Oliver and Palumbi (2011), "the vast majority of studies that investigate the effects of fluctuating thermal regimes on thermal tolerance have examined daily thermal cycles in which the hottest temperatures lasted on the timescale of hours," and in eight of ten such studies-performed on taxa as diverse as corals, crustaceans, fish, and amphibians-"organisms that were acclimated to a daily fluctuating thermal regime showed thermal tolerance or tolerance-relevant gene expression (e.g., heat shock proteins) that was equal to, or greater than, that of organisms acclimated to a thermal regime held constant at the maximum temperature of the fluctuating regime," citing Hutchison and Ferrance (1970), Otto (1974), Sastry (1979), Thorp and Wineriter (1981), Threader and Houston (1983), Podrabsky and Somero (2004), Schaefer and Ryan (2006), and Putnam et al. (2010).

Working among back-reef pools in American Samoa that differ in diurnal thermal variation, Oliver and Palumbi experimentally heat-stressed Acropora hyacinthus corals from a thermally moderate lagoon pool and a more thermally variable pool that naturally experienced two- to three-hour high temperature events during summer low tides, after which they compared coral mortality and photosystem II photochemical efficiency of colony fragments they collected from each of these lagoons that they exposed to either ambient (28.0°C) or elevated (31.5°C) water temperatures. The two researchers report in the heated treatment, "moderate pool corals showed nearly 50% mortality whether they hosted heat-sensitive or heat-resistant symbionts," whereas "variable pool corals, all of which hosted heat-resistant symbionts, survived well, showing low mortalities statistically indistinguishable from controls held at ambient temperatures." Also in the heated treatment, they state, "moderate pool corals hosting heat-sensitive algae showed rapid rates of decline in algal photosystem II photochemical efficiency," whereas those "hosting heat-resistant algae showed intermediate levels of decline." And as might have been expected, they found "variable pool corals hosting heat-resistant algae showed the least decline."

Oliver and Palumbi say their results suggest "previous exposure to an environmentally variable microhabitat adds substantially to coral-algal thermal tolerance, beyond that provided by heat-resistant symbionts alone," indicating a latent potential of Earth's corals to adapt to warmer temperatures than scientists believed possible in the past, should they gradually begin to experience recurring daily episodes of greater warmth in a gradually warming world.

In a study designed to investigate how coral assemblages in the Persian Gulf might cope with global warming via reproductive biology, Bauman et al. (2011) examined six locally common coral species on two shallow reef sites in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, in 2008 and 2009, to investigate their patterns of reproduction, focusing primarily on the timing and synchrony of spawning. Results indicated the reproductive biology of the six coral species in the southern Persian Gulf "appears to be well adapted to extreme annual environmental fluctuations" and is "remarkably similar to conspecifics elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific (Baird et al., 2009a,b)." They also found "the adaptive capacity of corals in the Persian Gulf is likely facilitated by a combination of short-term acclimation in individuals during acute environmental conditions (e.g., recurrent bleaching events) and long-term adaptation among coral populations to chronic environmental conditions (e.g., extreme temperatures)."

Bauman et al. state their work "confirms that corals are capable of reproductive activities under extreme environmental conditions," as Coles and Fadlallah (1991) and Coles and Brown (2003) also found. Hence, they state, "coral populations can survive and proliferate in extreme conditions that are projected to occur in many other regions of the world by the end of this century," noting, "the recovery of these coral assemblages following mortality induced by a number of recent temperature-related bleaching events (1996, 1998 and 2002) suggests these assemblages are also resilient to extreme fluctuations in water temperature," citing in this regard Riegl (1999, 2003) and Burt et al. (2008).

Serrano et al. (2013) investigated the adaptation of corals to temperature-related stresses through range expansion or migration. In prefacing their work, the team of researchers state, "despite the evidence that some coral species appear to be responding to climatic warming by expanding their distributions toward the poles (Wooddroffe, 2011), it has been argued that latitudinal migration is unlikely to occur rapidly enough to respond to the current projected temperature change (3-6°C over the next 100 years (IPCC, 2007)) due to the significant distance involved (i.e., the latitudinal temperature gradient is ~1.5°C/1000 km), the effects of temperature on reproduction, and the decrease in carbonate ion concentrations at high latitudes." To test this contention, Serrano et al. analyzed a long-term, large-scale observational dataset to characterize the dynamics of a hermatypic coral (Oculina patagonica) in regard to its "recent northward range shift along the coast of Catalonia," while examining "the main factors that could have influenced this spread," which they did "by monitoring 223 locations including natural and artificial habitats along >400 km of coastline over the last 19 years (1992-2010)."

The six Spanish scientists report Oculina patagonica "increased from being present in one location in 1992 to occur on 19% of the locations in 2010, and exhibited an acceleration of its spreading over time driven by the joint action of neighborhood and long-distance dispersal." They further note the "northward expansion has occurred at the fastest rate (22 km per year) reported for a coral species thus far." Regarding the significance of these findings, Serrano et al. write, "a coral species with particular biological characteristics that allow it to withstand the temperature challenge that accompanies northward migration as well as the natural and anthropogenic side effects that this type of migration involves (i.e., competition with macroalgae, high sediment loads, turbidity, water chemistry) has accomplished a successful northward expansion and may be able to keep pace with the global warming prediction of ~3°C over the next 100 years."

Yamano et al. (2011) report "although most studies of climate change effects on corals have focused on temperature-induced coral bleaching in tropical areas, poleward range shifts and/or expansions may also occur in temperate areas, as suggested by geological records and present-day eyewitnesses in several localities," citing Greenstein and Pandolfi (2008) and Precht and Aronson (2004). To explore this subject further, Yamano et al. collected records of coral species occurrence from eight temperate regions of Japan along a latitudinal gradient," where they obtained what they describe as "the first large-scale evidence of the poleward range expansion of modern corals, based on 80 years of national records ... where century-long measurements of in situ sea-surface temperatures have shown statistically significant rises."

Results indicated "four major coral species categories, including two key species for reef formation in tropical areas, showed poleward range expansions since the 1930s, whereas no species demonstrated southward range shrinkage or local extinction," adding "the speed of these expansions reached up to 14 km per year," which they say "is far greater than that for other species." They further note, "in regions with poleward current flows (east coast of the United States [Precht and Aronson, 2004], east coast of South America, east coast of Africa and east coast of Australia [Figueira and Booth, 2010]) the speed would be much greater."

The Japanese scientists conclude their results, "in combination with recent findings suggesting range expansions of tropical coral-reef associated organisms, strongly suggest that rapid, fundamental modifications of temperate coastal ecosystems could be in progress." In light of these facts, they suggest, "temperate areas may serve as refugia for tropical corals in an era of global warming."

Van Woesik et al. (2012) examined the response of more than 30,000 coral colonies at 80 sites in Palau during a regional thermal-stress event in 2010, to determine "whether any habitats were comparatively resistant to thermal stress." The six scientists discovered (1) "bleaching was most severe in the northwestern lagoon, in accordance with satellite-derived maximum temperatures and anomalous temperatures above the long-term averages," (2) corals there "suffered the most extensive bleaching and the highest mortality," but (3) "in the bays where temperatures were higher than elsewhere, bleaching and mortality were low." As for why this was so, they suggest "constant exposure to high temperatures, and high vertical attenuation of light caused by naturally high suspended particulate matter buffered the corals in bays from the 2010 regional thermal-stress event." In concluding their paper, van Woesik et al. say their study shows "reefs around bays were more resistant to regional thermal stress than patch and outer reefs," and "nearshore reefs in the bays are therefore valuable refuges to buffer coral-reef ecosystems against climate change-induced disturbances," and they thus "should be given high conservation status because they provide refugia for coral populations as the oceans continue to warm."

Carilli et al. (2012) note "observations indicating that mass bleaching events have recently become more common, combined with projected increases in heat stress, have prompted dire predictions for the future of coral reefs under unabated greenhouse gas emissions scenarios," citing Hoegh-Guldberg (1999) and Donner et al. (2005). However, they write, "there is evidence that corals may adapt to better withstand heat stress via a number of mechanisms," as "corals might acquire more thermally-resistant symbionts (Buddemeier and Fautin, 1993; Rowan, 2004), or might increase their own physiological mechanisms to reduce bleaching susceptibility by producing oxidative enzymes (Coles and Brown, 2003) or photoprotective compounds (Salih et al., 2000)." They emphasize there is evidence suggesting the susceptibility of a given coral or reef to bleaching depends on the thermal history of that coral or reef (Thompson and Van Woesik, 2009; Donner, 2011; Brown et al., 2002). They thus explored that phenomenon in their study.

Carilli et al. "collected cores from massive Porites sp. corals in the Gilbert Islands of Kiribati to determine how corals along a natural gradient in temperature variability responded to recent heat stress events," and "examined changes in coral skeletal growth rates and partial mortality scars (Carilli et al., 2010) to investigate the impact of the bleaching event in 2004 (Donner, 2011) on corals from different temperature variability regimes."

The three researchers-from Australia, Canada, and the United States-discovered the spatial patterns in skeletal growth rates and partial mortality scars found in corals from the central and northern islands suggest "corals subject to larger year-to-year fluctuations in maximum ocean temperature were more resistant to a 2004 warm-water event," and "a subsequent 2009 warm event had a disproportionately larger impact on those corals from the island with lower historical heat stress." Thus in the concluding sentence of their paper's abstract, Carilli et al. say their study indicates "coral reefs in locations with more frequent warm events may be more resilient to future warming."

Penin et al. (2013) "compared variations in spatial and taxonomic patterns between two bleaching events at the scale of an island (Moorea Island, French Polynesia)," where "nine stations involving three locations (Haapiti, Tiahura, and Viapahu) and three depths (6, 12, and 18 m) have been routinely surveyed for various scientific purposes since 2001," as described by Penin et al. (2007a, 2010). They measured bleaching intensity "two weeks following the first signs of bleaching (Penin et al., 2007b)" for six coral genera (Acropora, Montipora, Montastrea, Pavona, Pocillopora, and Porites) at each of the nine stations in 2002 and 2007. The six coral genera accounted for 88% of the total coral assemblage.

Their measurements showed the "thermal stress was similar between the two years studied." However, they note, "the bleaching intensity was lower in 2007 (25-49%) than in 2002 (39-72%)," and "the response to elevated temperature was delayed in the latter year." In addition, "the outer slopes at Moorea Island are located in an oligotrophic oceanic environment and are not under terrestrial influence, which makes it unlikely that there was any effect of nutrients on the response of the corals, as has been proposed for other reef ecosystems (Wooldridge and Done, 2009)." The three researchers conclude "it is likely that the observed decrease in stress response was the result of acclimatization of the coral/algal holobionts (Berkelmans et al., 2004; Maynard et al., 2008) or an influx of thermo-tolerant colonies between 2002 and 2007." Providing further support for their conclusions, they note several "similar decreases in susceptibility to thermal stress have been documented between successive bleaching events, including between 1991 and 1994 at Moorea Island (Adjeroud et al., 2002), between 1998 and 2002 on the Great Barrier Reef in Australia (Maynard et al., 2008b), and between 1982-83 and 1997-98 in Panama (Glynn et al., 2001), Costa Rica (Jimenez et al., 2001), and at the Galapagos Islands (Podesta and Glynn, 2001)."

As background for their work, Mayfield et al. (2013) write, "recent work has found that pocilloporid corals from regions characterized by unstable temperatures, such as those exposed to periodic upwelling, display a remarkable degree of phenotypic plasticity," and "some recent works have shown that not all corals bleach, or even manifest signs of stress, at elevated temperatures predicted to characterize reefs in the coming decades (Barshis et al., 2013)." They also note "corals from highly variable temperature environments of both American Samoa (Oliver and Palumbi, 2011) and southern Taiwan (Mayfield et al., 2011, 2013) have previously been shown to withstand exposure to temperatures (e.g., 30-31°C) that induce bleaching or even mortality in conspecifics from other regions (Jokiel and Coles, 1990; Brown, 1997)."

To "uncover the long-term impacts of elevated temperature exposure to corals from reefs that experience episodic upwelling," Mayfield et al. conducted a mesocosm-based experiment in which P. damicornis specimens collected from an upwelling coral reef on Houbihu (a small embayment within Nanwan Bay, southern Taiwan) were exposed for nine months to nearly 30°C, a temperature that the corals normally encounter in situ for just a few hours per year (Mayfield et al., 2012). The three researchers write, "upon nine months of exposure to nearly 30°C, all colony (mortality and surface area), polyp (Symbiodinium density and chlorophyll a content), tissue (total thickness), and molecular (gene expression and molecular composition)-level parameters were documented at similar levels between experimental corals and controls incubated at 26.5°C, suggesting that this species can readily acclimate to elevated temperatures that cause significant degrees of stress, or even bleaching and mortality, in conspecifics of other regions of the Indo-Pacific."

In light of their findings and those of other scientists studying the subject, Mayfield et al. state, "there is now a growing body of evidence to support the notion that corals inhabiting more thermally unstable habitats outperform conspecifics from reefs characterized by more stable temperatures when exposed to elevated temperatures," citing Coles (1975), Castillo and Helmuth (2005), and Oliver and Palumbi (2011). They report also report, "in other systems, provocative gene expression changes, such as the constitutive up-regulation of genes involved in thermotolerance (e.g., hsps; Heath et al., 1993; Feder, 1996), underlie the capacity for organisms to inhabit high and/or variable temperature environments," as Barshis et al. (2013) also documented in corals.

Indeed. As more and more research is conducted it is becoming more and more apparent that the doom and gloom predictions of widespread coral decline due to global warming are unlikely to occur.

References
Adbo, D., Burgess, S., Coleman, G. and Osborne, K. 2004. Surveys of Benthic Reef Communities using Underwater Video. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia.

Adjeroud, M., Michonneau, F., Edmunds, P.J., Chancerelle, Y., Lison de Loma, T., Penin, L., Thibaut, L., Vidal-Dupiol, J., Salvat, B. and Galzin, R. 2009. Recurrent disturbances, recovery trajectories, and resilience of coral assemblages on a South Central Pacific reef. Coral Reefs 28: 775-780.

Ayre, D.J. and Hughes, T.P. 2000. Genotypic diversity and gene flow in brooding and spawning corals along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Evolution 54: 1590-1605.

Ayre, D.J. and Hughes, T.P. 2004. Climate change, genotypic diversity and gene flow in reef-building corals. Ecology Letters 7: 273-278.

Baird, A.H., Guest, J.R. and Willis, B.L. 2009a. Systematic and biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of scleractinian corals. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 531-571.

Baird, A.H., Birrell, C.L., Hughes, T.P., McDonald, A., Nojima, S., Page, C. Pratchett, M.S. and Yamasaki, H. 2009b. Latitudinal variation in reproductive synchrony in Acropora assemblages: Japan vs. Australia. Galaxea 11: 101-108.

Baker, A.C. 2001. Reef corals bleach to survive change. Nature 411: 765-766.

Baker, A.C., Starger, C.J., McClanahan, T.R. and Glynn, P.W. 2002. Symbiont communities in reef corals following the 1997-98 El Niņo-will recovering reefs be more resistant to a subsequent bleaching event? Proceedings of the International Society of Reef Studies (Abstract Volume 10: European Meeting, Cambridge, UK, September).

Barshis, D.J., Ladner, J.T., Oliver, T.A., Seneca, F.O., Traylor-Knowles, N. and Palumbi, S.R. 2013. Genomic basis for coral resilience to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110: 1387-1392.

Brown, B.E. 1997. Coral bleaching: causes and consequences. Coral Reefs 16S: 129-138.

Bauman, A.G., Baird, A.H. and Cavalcante, G.H. 2011. Coral reproduction in the world's warmest reefs: southern Persian Gulf (Dubai, United Arab Emirates). Coral Reefs 30: 405-413.

Bellantuono, A.J., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. and Rodriguez-Lanetty, M. 2012. Resistance to thermal stress in corals without changes in symbiont composition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 1100-1107.

Bellwood, D.R., Hughes, T.P., Folke, C. and Nystrom, M. 2004. Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429: 827-833.

Berkelmans, R., De'ath, G., Kininmonth, S. and Skirving, W.J. 2004. A comparison of the 1998 and 2002 coral bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef: spatial correlation, patterns and predictions. Coral Reefs 23: 74-83.

Berkelmans, R. and van Oppen, M. 2006. The role of zooxanthellae in the thermal tolerance of corals: a 'nugget of hope' for coral reefs in an era of climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273: 2305-2312.

Brown, B. 1997. Coral bleaching: causes and consequences. Coral Reefs 16: S129-S138.

Brown, B.E., Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. 2002. Serial patterns of biodiversity change in corals across shallow reef flats in Ko Phuket, Thailand, due to the effects of local (sedimentation) and regional (climatic) perturbations. Marine Biology 141: 24-29.

Brown, N., Dunne, R., Goodson, M. and Douglas, A. 2002. Experience shapes the susceptibility of a reef coral to bleaching. Coral Reefs 21: 119-126.

Buddemeier, R.W. and Fautin, D.G. 1993. Coral bleaching as an adaptive mechanism. BioScience 43: 320-326.

Burt, J., Bartholomew, A. and Usseglio, P. 2008. Recovery of corals a decade after bleaching event in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Marine Biology 154: 27-36.

Carilli, J., Donner, S.D. and Hartmann, A.C. 2012. Historical temperature variability affects coral response to heat stress. PLoS ONE 7: e34418.

Carilli, J., Norris, R.D., Black, B., Walsh, S.W. and McField, M. 2010. Century-scale records of coral growth rates indicate that local stressors reduce coral thermal tolerance threshold. Global Change Biology 16: 1247-1257.

Carriquiry, J., Cupul-Magaņa, A., Rodriguez-Zaragoza, F. and Medina-Rosas, P. 2001. Coral bleaching and mortality in the Mexican Pacific during the 1997-1998 El Niņo and prediction from a remote sensing approach. Bulletin of the Marine Sciences 69: 237-249.

Castillo, K.D. and Helmuth, B.S.T. 2005. Influence of thermal history on the response of Montastraea annularis to short-term temperature exposure. Marine Biology 148: 261-270.

Coles, S. 1975. A comparison of effects of elevated temperature versus temperature fluctuations on reef corals at Kahe Point, Oahu. Pacific Science 29: 15-18.

Coles, S.L. and Brown, B.E. 2003. Coral bleaching-capacity for acclimatization and adaptation. Advances in Marine Biology 46: 183-223.

Coles, S.L. and Fadlallah, Y.H. 1991. Reef coral survival and mortality at low temperatures in the Arabian Gulf-new species-lower temperature limits. Coral Reefs 9: 231-237.

Connell, J.H. 1997. Disturbance and recovery of coral assemblages. Coral Reefs 16: S101-S113.

Cortes, J. and Jimenez, C. 2003. Corals and coral reefs of the Pacific of Costa Rica: history, research and status. In: Cortes, J. (Ed.) Latin American Coral Reefs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 361-385.

Davies, P.S. 1989. Short-term growth measurements of corals using an accurate buoyant weighing technique. Marine Biology 101: 389-395.

Donner, S.D. 2011. An evaluation of the effect of recent temperature variability on the prediction of coral bleaching events. Ecological Applications 21: 1718-1730.

Donner, S.D., Skirving, W.J., Little, C.M., Oppenheimer, M. and Hoegh-Guldberg, O. 2005. Global assessment of coral bleaching and required rates of adaptation under climate change. Global Change Biology 11: 2251-2265.

Dunne, R.P. and Brown, B.E. 2001. The influence of solar radiation on bleaching of shallow water reef corals in the Andaman Sea, 1993-98. Coral Reefs 20: 201-210.

Edmunds, P.J. 1994. Evidence that reef-wide patterns of coral bleaching may be the result of the distribution of bleaching susceptible clones. Marine Biology (Berlin) 121: 137-142.

Emslie, M.J., Cheal, A.J., Sweatman, H. and Delean, S. 2008. Recovery from disturbance of coral and reef fish communities on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 371: 177-190.

Enfield, D. 2001. Evolution and historical perspective of the 1997-1998 El Niņo-Southern Oscillation event. Bulletin of the Marine Sciences 69: 7-25.

Fang, L.-S., Huang, S.-P. and Lin, K.-L. 1997. High temperature induces the synthesis of heat-shock proteins and the elevation of intracellular calcium in the coral Acropora grandis. Coral Reefs 16: 127-131.

Feder, M. 1996. Ecological and evolutionary physiology of stress proteins and the stress response: the Drosophila melanogaster model. In: Johnston, I.A. and Bennett, A.F. (Eds.). Animals and Temperature: Phenotypic and Evolutionary Adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 79-102.

Feingold, J. 1995. Effects of Elevated Water Temperature on Coral Bleaching and Survival During El Niņo Disturbance Events. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.

Figueira, W.F. and Booth, D.J. 2010. Increasing ocean temperatures allow tropical fishes to survive overwinter in temperate waters. Global Change Biology 16: 506-516.

Fitt, W., Brown, B., Warner, M. and Dunne, R. 2001. Coral bleaching: interpretation of thermal tolerance limits and thermal thresholds in tropical corals. Coral Reefs 20: 51-65.

Glynn, P.W., Colley, S., Eakin, C., Smith, D., Cortes, J., Gassman, N. Guzman, H., Del Rossario, J. and Feingold, J. 1994. Reef coral reproduction in the eastern Pacific: Costa Rica, Panama, and Galapagos Islands (Ecuador)-II. Poritidae. Marine Biology 118: 191-208.

Glynn, P.W., Gassman, N., Eakin, M., Cortes, J., Smith, D. and Guzman, H. 1991. Reef coral reproduction in the eastern Pacific: Costa Rica, Panama, and Galapagos Islands (Ecuador)-I. Pocilloporidae. Marine Biology 109: 355-368.

Glynn, P.W., Mate, J.L., Baker, A.C. and Calderon, M.O. 2001. Coral bleaching and mortality in Panama and Ecuador during the 1997-1998 El Niņo-Southern Oscillation event: Spatial/temporal patterns and comparisons with the 1982-1983 event. Bulletin of Marine Science 69: 79-109.

Greenstein, B.J. and Pandolfi, J.M. 2008. Escaping the heat: Range shifts of reef coral taxa in coastal Western Australia. Global Change Biology 14: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01506.x.

Grimsditch, G., Mwaura, J.M., Kilonzo, J. and Amiyo, N. 2010. The effects of habitat on coral bleaching responses in Kenya. Ambio 39: 295-304.

Guzman, H.M. and Cortes, J. 1992. Cocos Island (Pacific of Costa Rica) coral reefs after the 1982-83 El Niņo disturbance. Revista de Biologia Tropical 40: 309-324.

Guzman, H.M. and Cortes, J. 2001. Changes in reef community structure after fifteen years of natural disturbances in the eastern Pacific (Costa Rica). Bulletin of the Marine Sciences 69: 133-149.

Guzman, H.M. and Cortes, J. 2007. Reef recovery 20 years after the 1982-1983 El Niņo massive mortality. Marine Biology 151: 401-411.

Halford, A., Cheal, A.J., Ryan, D. and Williams, D.McB. 2004. Resilience to large-scale disturbance in coral and fish assemblages on the Great Barrier Reef. Ecology 85: 1892-1905.

Heath, A.G., Turner, B.J. and Davis, W.P. 1993. Temperature preferences and tolerances of three fish species inhabiting hyper-thermal ponds on mangrove islands. Hydrobiologia 259: 47-55.

Hoegh-Guldberg, O. 1999. Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world's coral reefs. Marine and Freshwater Research 50: 839-866.

Hughes, T.P., Baird, A.H., Bellwood, D.R., Card, M., Connolly, S.R., Folke, C., Grosberg, R., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jackson, J.B.C., Kleypas, J., Lough, J.M., Marshall, P., Nystrom, M., Palumbi, S.R., Pandolfi, J.M., Rosen, B. and Roughgarden, J. 2003. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science 301: 929-933.

Hutchison, V.H. and Ferrance, M.R. 1970. Thermal tolerances of Rana pipiens acclimated to daily temperature cycles. Herpetologica 26: 1-8.

IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S.D., Qin, M., Manning, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., Tignor, M.B., Miller Jr., H.L. and Chen, Z. (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Jimenez, C. and Cortes, J. 2003b. Growth of seven species of scleractinian corals in an upwelling environment of the eastern Pacific (Golfo de Papagayo, Costa Rica). Bulletin of the Marine Sciences 72: 187-198.

Jimenez, C.E. and Cortes, J. 2003a. Coral cover change associated to El Niņo, eastern Pacific, Costa Rica, 1992-2001. Marine Ecology 24: 179-192.

Jimenez, C., Cortes, J., Leon, A. and Ruiz, E. 2001. Coral bleaching and mortality associated with the 1997-98 El Niņo in an upwelling environment in the eastern Pacific (Gulf of Papagayo, Costa Rica). Bulletin of the Marine Sciences 68: 151-169.

Jokiel, P.L. and Coles, S.L. 1990. Response of Hawaiian and other Indo Pacific reef corals to elevated temperatures. Coral Reefs 8: 155-162.

Lough, J. 2007. Climate and climate change on the Great Barrier Reef. In: Johnson, J.E. and Marshall, P.A. (Eds.) Climate Change and the Great Barrier Reef: A Vulnerability Assessment. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and the Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Water Resources, Townsville, Australia, pp. 15-50.

Loya, Y., Sakai, K., Yamazato, K., Nakano, Y., Sambali, H. and van Woesik, R. 2001. Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecology Letters 4: 122-131.

Marshall, P.A. and Baird, A.H. 2000. Bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef: differential susceptibilities among taxa. Coral Reefs 19: 155-163.

Mayfield, A.B., Chan, P.H., Putnam, H.P., Chen, C.S. and Fan, T.Y. 2012. The effects of a variable temperature regime on the physiology of the reef-building coral Seriatopora hystrix: results from a laboratory-based reciprocal transplant. Journal of Experimental Biology 215: 4183-4195.

Mayfield, A.B., Chen, M., Meng, P.J., Lin, H.J., Chen, C.S. and Liu, P.J. 2013. The physiological response of the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis to elevated temperature: results from coral reef mesocosm experiments in southern Taiwan. Marine Environmental Research 86: 1-11.

Mayfield, A.B., Fan, T.-Y. and Chen, C.-S. 2013. Physiological acclimation to elevated temperature in a reef-building coral from an upwelling environment. Coral Reefs 32: 909-921.

Mayfield, A.B., Wang, L.H., Tang, P.C., Hsiao, Y.Y., Fan, T.Y., Tsai, C.L. and Chen, C.S. 2011. Assessing the impacts of experimentally elevated temperature on the biological composition and molecular chaperone gene expression of a reef coral. PLoS ONE 6: e26529.

Maynard, J.A., Anthony, K.R.N., Marshall, P.A. and Masiri, I. 2008b. Major bleaching events can lead to increased thermal tolerance in corals. Marine Biology 155: 173-182.

Maynard, J.A., Baird, A.H. and Pratchett, M.S. 2008a. Revisiting the Cassandra syndrome; the changing climate of coral reef research. Coral Reefs 27: 745-749.

McClanahan, T., Maina, J. and Pet-Soede, L. 2002. Effects of the 1998 coral mortality event on Kenyan coral reefs and fisheries. Ambio 31: 543-550.

McClanahan, T., Weil, E., Cortes, J., Baird, A.H. and Ateweberhan, M. 2009. Consequences of coral bleaching for sessile reef organisms. In: van Oppen, M.J.H. and Lough, J.M., Eds. Ecological Studies: Coral Bleaching: Patterns, Processes, Causes and Consequences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

McPhaden, M. 1999. Genesis and evolution of the 1997-98 El Niņo. Science 283: 950-954.

Meyer, E., Davies, S., Wang, S., Willis, B.L., Abrego, D., Juenger, T.E. and Matz, M.V. 2009. Genetic variation in responses to a settlement cue and elevated temperature in the reef-building coral Acropora millepora. Marine Ecology Progress Series 392: 81-92.

Middlebrook, R., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. and Leggat, W. 2008. The effect of thermal history on the susceptibility of reef-building corals to thermal stress. The Journal of Experimental Biology 211: 1050-1056.

Naumann, M.S., Orejas, C. and Ferrier-Pages, C. 2013. High thermal tolerance of two Mediterranean cold-water coral species maintained in aquaria. Coral Reefs 32: 749-754.

Oliver, J.K., Berkelmans, R. and Eakin, C.M. 2009. Coral bleaching in space and time. In: van Oppen, M.J.H. and Lough, J.M. (Eds.) Coral Bleaching: Patterns, Processes, Causes and Consequences. Springer, New York, New York, USA, pp. 21-39.

Oliver, T.A. and Palumbi, S.R. 2011. Do fluctuating temperature environments elevate coral thermal tolerance? Coral Reefs 30: 429-440.

Osborne, K., Dolman, A.M., Burgess, S.C. and Johns, K.A. 2011. Disturbance and the dynamics of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef (1995-2009). PLoS ONE 6: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017516.

Otto, R. 1974. The effects of acclimation to cyclic thermal regimes on heat tolerance of the western mosquitofish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 103: 331-335.

Penin, L., Adjeroud, M., Pratchet, M.S. and Hughes, T.P. 2007a. Spatial distribution of juvenile and adult corals around Moorea (French Polynesia): implications for population regulation. Bulletin of Marine Science 80: 379-389.

Penin, L., Adjeroud, M., Schrimm, M. and Lenihan, H. 2007b. High spatial variability in coral bleaching around Moorea (French Polynesia): patterns across locations and water depths. Comptes Rendus Biologies 330: 171-181.

Penin, L., Michonneau, F., Baird, A.H., Connolly, S.R., Pratchett, M.S., Kayal, M. and Adjeroud, M. 2010. Early post-settlement mortality and the structure of coral assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 408: 55-64.

Penin, L., Vidal-Dupiol, J. and Adjeroud, M. 2013. Response of coral assemblages to thermal stress: are bleaching intensity and spatial patterns consistent between events. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185: 5031-5042.

Podesta, G.P. and Glynn, P.W. 2001. The 1997-98 El Niņo event in Panama and Galapagos: an update of thermal stress indices relative to coral bleaching. Bulletin of Marine Science 69: 43-59.

Podrabsky, J. and Somero, G. 2004. Changes in gene expression associated with acclimation to constant temperatures and fluctuating daily temperatures in an annual killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus. Journal of Experimental Biology 207: 2237-2254.

Precht, W.F. and Aronson, R.B. 2004. Climate flickers and range shifts of reef corals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 307-314.

Putnam, H., Edmunds, P. and Fan, T. 2010. Effect of a fluctuating thermal regime on adult and larval reef corals. Invertebrate Biology 129: 199-209.

Riegl, B. 1999. Corals in a non-reef setting in the southern Arabian Gulf (Dubai, UAE): fauna and community structure in response to recurring mass mortality. Coral Reefs 18: 63-73.

Riegl, B. 2002. Effects of the 1996 and 1998 positive sea-surface temperature anomalies on corals, coral diseases and fish in the Arabian Gulf (Dubai, UAE). Marine Biology (Berlin) 140: 29-40.

Riegl, B. 2003. Climate change and coral reefs: different effects in two high-latitude areas (Arabian Gulf, South Africa). Coral Reefs 22: 433-446.

Rowan, R. 2004. Coral bleaching: Thermal adaptation in reef coral symbionts. Nature 430: 742.

Salih, A., Larkum, A., Cox, G., Kuhl, M. and Hoegh-Guldberg, O. 2000. Fluorescent pigments in corals are photoprotective. Nature 408: 850-853.

Sastry, A. 1979. Metabolic adaptation of Cancer irroratus developmental stages to cyclic temperatures. Marine Biology 51: 243-250.

Schaefer, J. and Ryan, A. 2006. Developmental plasticity in the thermal tolerance of zebrafish Danio rerio. Journal of Fish Biology 69: 722-734.

Serrano, E., Coma, R., Ribes, M., Weitzmann, B., Garcia, M. and Ballesteros, E. 2013. Rapid northward spread of a zooxanthellate coral enhanced by artificial structures and sea warming in the Western Mediterranean. PLoS ONE 8: e52739.

Sheppard, C.R.C., Harris, A. and Sheppard, A.L.S. 2008. Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362: 109-117.

Skelly, D.K., Joseph, L.N., Possingham, H.P., Freidenburg, L.K., Farrugia, T.J., Kinnison, M.T. and Hendry, A.P. 2007. Evolutionary responses to climate change. Conservation Biology 21: 1353-1355.

Smith-Keune, C. and van Oppen, M. 2006. Genetic structure of a reef-building coral from thermally distinct environments on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 25: 493-502.

Thompson, D.M. and Van Woesik, R. 2009. Corals escape bleaching in regions that recently and historically experienced frequent thermal stress. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 2893.

Thorp, J.W. and Wineriter, S.A. 1981. Stress and growth response of juvenile crayfish to rhythmic and arrhythmic temperature fluctuations. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 10: 69-77.

Threader, R. and Houston, A.H. 1983. Heat tolerance and resistance in juvenile rainbow trout acclimated to diurnally cycling temperatures. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 75: 153-155.

Underwood, J.N. 2009. Genetic diversity and divergence among coastal and offshore reefs in a hard coral depend on geographic discontinuity and oceanic currents. Evolutionary Applications 2: 222-233.

van Woesik, R., Houk, P., Isechal, A.L., Idechong, J.W., Victor, S. and Golbuu, Y. 2012. Climate-change refugia in the sheltered bays of Palau: analogs of future reefs. Ecology and Evolution 2: 2474-2484.

Vargas-Angel, B., Zapata, F., Hernandez, H. and Jimenez, J. 2001. Coral and coral reef responses to the 1997-1998 El Niņo event on the Pacific coast of Colombia. Bulletin of the Marine Sciences 69: 111-132.

Wakeford, M., Done, T.J. and Johnson, C.R. 2008. Decadal trends in a coral community and evidence of changed disturbance regime. Coral Reefs 27: 1-13.

Wang, S., Zhang, L. and Matz, M. 2009. Microsatellite characterization and marker development from public EST and WGS databases in the reef-building coral Acropora millepora (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Scleractinia). Journal of Heredity 100: 329-337.

Wellington, G.M., Glynn, P.W., Strong, A.E., Nauarrete, S.A., Wieters, E. and Hubbard, D. 2001. Crisis on coral reefs linked to climate change. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 82: 1,7.

Willis, B.L., Page, C.A. and Dinsdale, E.A. 2004. Coral disease on the Great Barrier Reef. In: Rosenberg, E. and Loya, Y. (Eds.) Coral Health and Disease. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 69-104.

Wooddroffe, C.D. 2011. Poleward extension of reefs. In: Hopley, D. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Modern Coral Reefs: Structure, Form and Process. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 813-815.

Wooldridge, S.A. and Done, T.J. 2009. Improved water quality can ameliorate effects of climate change on corals. Ecological Applications 19: 1492-1499.

Yamano, H., Sugihara, K. and Nomura, K. 2011. Rapid poleward range expansion of tropical reef corals in response to rising sea surface temperatures. Geophysical Research Letters 38: 10.1029/2010GL046474.

Zapata, F.A. and Vargas-Angel, B. 2003. Corals and coral reefs of the Pacific coast of Columbia. In: Cortes, J. (Ed.) Latin American Coral Reefs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 419-447.

Last updated 23 December 2014