Learn how plants respond to higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations

How does rising atmospheric CO2 affect marine organisms?

Click to locate material archived on our website by topic


Cosmic Rays, Clouds and Climate: The Latest from Svensmark
Reference
Svensmark, H., Bondo, T. and Svensmark, J. 2009. Cosmic ray decreases affect atmospheric aerosols and clouds. Geophysical Research Letters 36: 10.1029/2009GL038429.

Background
Are there linkages between the sun, cosmic rays, aerosols and liquid-water clouds that operate on a global scale? ... and that could be responsible for a major portion of earth's climatic variability? This question has inspired the work of Henrik Svensmark for well over a decade now; and in this paper he and two colleagues describe their most recent contribution to his personal quest for answers.

What was done
The three scientists -- all from the National Space Institute of the Technical University of Denmark in Copenhagen -- explore the consequences of Forbush decreases (FDs) in the influx of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) that are produced by periodic explosive events on the sun that result in "magnetic plasma clouds from solar coronal mass ejections that pass near the earth and provide a temporary shield against GCRs."

What was learned
Based on cloud liquid water content data obtained over the world's oceans by the Special Sounder Microwave Imager, liquid water cloud fraction data obtained by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, and data on IR detection of low clouds over the ocean by the International Satellite Cloud Climate Project -- as well as FD data obtained from 130 neutron monitors world-wide and the Nagoya muon detector -- Svensmark et al. found what they describe as "substantial declines in liquid-water clouds, apparently tracking the declining cosmic rays and reaching minima some [~7] days after the GCR minima." Concurrently, they also found that "parallel observations by the aerosol robotic network AERONET reveal falls in the relative abundance of fine aerosol particles, which, in normal circumstances, could have evolved into cloud condensation nuclei."

What it means
The Danish scientists say their results "show global-scale evidence of conspicuous influences of solar variability on cloudiness and aerosols," and that "the loss of ions from the air during FDs reduces the cloud liquid water content over the oceans." In fact, "so marked was the response to relatively small variations in the total ionization," they concluded that "a large fraction of earth's clouds could be controlled by ionization."

These observations tend to support Svensmark's theory that solar-activity-induced decreases in GCR bombardment of the earth lead to decreases in low (<3.2 km) clouds as a result of reduced atmospheric ionization and, therefore, less fine aerosol particles that under normal circumstances could have evolved into cloud condensation nuclei that could have resulted in more low-level clouds that could have cooled the planet (but, obviously, were not there to do so under conditions of decreased GCR bombardment). This theory thus goes a very long way towards explaining why so many climatic phenomena appear to be related to numerous solar cycles of various frequencies (see Solar Influence in our Subject Index). And it provides a rational explanation for the bulk of the post-Little Ice Age warming of the earth that appears to have continued all the way through the 20th century.

Reviewed 5 August 2009